RAMS sent back by the principal contractor.
Reviewed by AI first, so the gaps are fixed before it goes.
UK-built · CDM · CIS · MTD
Unibuild’s AI RAMS review reads a risk assessment and method statement before it is released or accepted, and flags what your competent person should put right. It runs in the same system where the RAMS is written, approved, briefed and signed.

From the RAMS sent back by the principal contractor to the signature nobody can prove.
Reviewed by AI first, so the gaps are fixed before it goes.
Submissions reviewed by AI before you accept them.
Vague controls flagged before the RAMS is released.
Hazards without a matching control are flagged.
Details fill from the project. The review checks the rest.
Missing or generic emergency arrangements are flagged.
Read on the phone in the operative’s own language.
A signing link by email. No app to install.
Date, time and device printed on the RAMS PDF.
An edited RAMS is signed again. Every edit is logged.
Every RAMS record kept for seven years.
AI RAMS review is a check of a risk assessment and method statement by an AI model. It is made before the RAMS is released to site, or accepted from a subcontractor. It flags what a careful second reader would: vague controls, gaps and details that disagree.
Unibuild runs it inside the system where the RAMS is written, approved, briefed and signed. A flag becomes a fix on the same document, the operatives sign the fixed version, and the whole record is kept for seven years. The RAMS itself is covered on RAMS software.
The same review runs at the two moments a RAMS can let a firm down, and on estimates, quotations and tender submissions too.
The AI reads the RAMS before it is released to site or sent to the principal contractor. The writer fixes what is flagged, and the approved version is the one the operatives sign.
A subcontractor submits its RAMS into Unibuild, and the AI reads it before your reviewer does. Your reviewer then approves it or returns it with comments.
A method statement or a risk assessment issued on its own is reviewed the same way, before it is issued or accepted.
Each is reviewed by AI before it goes out, in the same system as the job. AI document review covers the whole set.
Published by Unibuild Technologies Limited · Updated . Safety references.
The gaps a principal contractor looks for, found before the principal contractor finds them.
| The flag | What it looks like in a RAMS | What a good RAMS says instead |
|---|---|---|
| Vague controls | “Take care at height.” “Use appropriate PPE.” | Which harness, which anchor point, and who checks them |
| A hazard with no control | A MEWP in the plant list, with no rescue plan in the controls | A control for every hazard the task and the plant bring |
| Copy from another job | Another site’s access route, hospital or client name | Details that belong to this site and this task |
| Generic emergency arrangements | An assembly point, and nothing else | Rescue, first aid, the nearest hospital and who raises the alarm |
| Site details that disagree | Two start dates, or two addresses for one job | One set of details, filled in from the project |
| PPE that does not match the hazards | Noise in the hazards, no hearing protection in the PPE list | PPE chosen for the hazards this task actually has |
| Out-of-date references | A withdrawn standard, or legislation that has since been replaced | The current standard or regulation |
| Other trades, the public and traffic | A task written as if nobody else were on site | Who shares the area, and what keeps them apart |
Start from around forty starter RAMS by trade, or from your own templates, imported free. Site and job details fill in from the project.
Before release, the AI reads the whole RAMS and flags vague controls, gaps and details that disagree. The writer fixes them on the same document.
Your reviewer approves the RAMS or returns it with comments. Every decision carries a name and a date, and both sides see where it stands.
Each operative reads the RAMS on the phone in their preferred language, with readability tools. The app carries accessibility tools as well.
Staff, subcontract, agency and temporary workers sign in the app, or through a unique link for each RAMS. The detail is on the RAMS app page.
Each signature carries its date, time and device, printed as the last page of the RAMS PDF. An edited RAMS is signed again.
Bring a RAMS you are about to send.
We load it in the demo and take it through the AI review, the approval, the operative’s phone and the signature page, on your own document.A review is only as useful as what happens after it. This is what happens after it, in each case.
| The moment | A separate checking tool | AI RAMS review in Unibuild |
|---|---|---|
| Where the RAMS lives | Uploaded to the tool, held somewhere else | Written, reviewed and held in one system |
| Fixing what is flagged | Edited elsewhere, then uploaded again | Fixed on the same document, as a new version |
| Subcontractor RAMS | Saved from an email, then uploaded | Submitted into Unibuild and reviewed there |
| Approval | Recorded in another system, or by email | Approved or returned, with a name and a date |
| Reaching the operatives | A separate job for the supervisor | Read on the phone, in their own language |
| Signatures | Collected on paper or in another app | In the app, or by a link in any browser |
| Proof for the auditor | A report on the document | Date, time and device on the last page of the PDF |
| Records | Kept for as long as the tool keeps them | Kept for seven years |
| Other documents | RAMS only | Estimates, quotations and tender submissions too |
The cost of AI is bespoke to each firm. You pay only for what you use, and we set it out in the demo.
Unibuild is bespoke business software for UK trades and specialist contractors: a platform in daily production since 2016, shaped to the way each firm already works.

The product information on this page is published by Unibuild. The legal references below cover Great Britain and were checked on . Northern Ireland has separate legislation.
For the check you make yourself, use the free RAMS review checklist. For writing one that stands up, read RAMS that hold up.
Trades where a RAMS is asked for before every start, and sent back when it reads as generic.
Same platform, same login. These are the modules that plan the work, record it, and hold the evidence it was done properly.
What makes a RAMS stand up, what an inspector asks for, and how two versions end up on one site.
A 30-minute live demo. We load a RAMS you already use and take it from the AI review to a signature on the phone.
Two minutes. A written figure by email, usually the same working day. Unlimited users, so every operative signing a RAMS is included.