Site diaries
and photos
01Dated as they happen, with trades on site and the weather captured. The contemporaneous evidence the whole claim later rests on.
UK-built · CDM · CIS · MTD
A site manager's real exposure is the argument a year later about what happened on a Tuesday. Unibuild builds the contemporaneous record as a by-product of running the site.

Site management software is the system a site manager, general foreman or contracts manager runs a job from: the daily record, the photographs, the permits and RAMS, who is actually on site, what plant is on hire, and what changed today. Unibuild holds all of it against one project number, so the diary, the hours, the near miss and the variation are the same record rather than six. It replaces the hardback diary in the cabin, the camera roll, the triplicate permit pad and the WhatsApp group nobody can search eighteen months later. Five things it has to carry.
Site records get skipped because the benefit arrives
months after the effort. The only fix is to make
recording take less time than not recording.
Dated as they happen, with trades on site and the weather captured. The contemporaneous evidence the whole claim later rests on.
Hot work, work at height, ladder and steps, and lone working, plus the general permit to work for electrical and mechanical isolation with the points of isolation and earthing identified. Signed at the point of issue.
Risk assessments and method statements per activity, signed by the operatives doing the work, on the phone in front of them.
Raised on site with the evidence attached, so the instruction and what it actually cost stay joined together.
Who is where next week, against the jobs that need them, so the resource conversation happens before Monday rather than on it.
Read-mostly, project-scoped, showing your client what you have approved for them to see. Fewer status calls, on purpose.
A site manager answers for people he does not
employ, on a site he does not own, to a principal
contractor who will ask him to prove it.
A working week on a live fit-out. Every entry below exists because somebody was doing his job, not because somebody was feeding a system.
Eleven operatives scan the poster on the hoarding. The project comes from the code, so nobody types a job number and nobody picks the wrong one. By eight you know who is on and who is not, and by Friday the week is already attributed to jobs for you to approve or query rather than assemble. The hours themselves are construction timesheet software's subject, not yours.
Four trades, the headcount and hours against each, and what each of them did. Then the delay, the request for information raised that morning, the delivery that did not arrive and the weather, each in its own field. The entry takes the next diary number and the moment it was saved is stamped alongside the date it covers.
The permit is raised on the phone before the grinder comes out, with the equipment, the services isolated, the fire watch and the two metre zone. The operative signs to accept it. The authoriser signs and grants until two o'clock rather than the five o'clock that was asked for, and the document shows both.
He is a subcontractor's man. He scans the near miss code on the same poster, photographs the handrail and submits. He has a reference number on his screen before he moves, the safety manager has the PDF on WhatsApp, and it sits on the alerts counter until somebody says what was done about it.
The diary for that Tuesday, the permit with both signatures on it, the photographs with the name of whoever released them and the time, and the clock-in record with the server time and the street address. Behind each one, 275 of the 295 live tables carry the creator, the last editor, the time, the IP address and the route that wrote the row, and the construction deployment holds 10,540 recorded actions against 1,410 timesheets.
The same platform, described for the job each person actually does. Every one of them is a different set of pages switched on, granted per person, not a different product.
Two things that decide whether the paperwork survives contact with the site.
