- What you get
- A live cost position, which is the useful half of the question and the half most firms cannot answer at all until the final account. Labour flows in automatically at real dated rates, purchase orders at committed value, and staff expenses as they are approved, all attached to the job, with the contract value derived from your client's own orders sitting next to it.
- What you do not get
- A complete profit and return calculation. Supplier invoice values do not reach costing in one of the two deployments, stores issues carry no value, and there is no overhead recovery. We would rather describe it that way than show you a report with a column that does not compute.
- Where one deployment goes further
- The site services system closes the loop back to the tender: a discrepancy view compares estimated hours against hours logged and estimated quantities against quantities used, section by section, and a programme view plots planned contract value against actual billed value week by week. That is genuinely stronger than anything the construction deployment computes, and it is what a full estimate against actual comparison looks like when the price library is populated.
- Why we lead with the limitation
- Because a commercial manager opens the report, looks for the profit column, and forms a permanent view of the supplier in that moment. Telling you first costs us nothing and buys the rest of the page some credibility. It is also the single clearest example on this website of what the tailored half of the engagement would actually build.