What the Construction Act
actually gives you.
Six rights that apply whether or not your contract mentions them, and whether or not anything was ever signed. What each one is, and where it stops.
Published ·6 min read·Written by Unibuild
The Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, as amended in 2009, gives every party to a construction contract six rights: stage payments, an adequate payment mechanism, payment notices, payment of the notified sum, suspension for non-payment, and adjudication at any time. It also makes pay when paid clauses ineffective. None of them can be contracted out of.
Why a statute exists for this at all
Construction is the only industry in the country with its own payment law. That is not an accident of drafting. It is there because the industry pays down a chain, each link holds the money a little longer than the one above it, and by the time it reaches the firm that did the work there may be nothing left. The Latham review said so in 1994, the Act followed in 1996, and the 2009 amendments tightened it because the first version was being drafted around.
What the Act does is impose a timetable and a set of defaults on contracts that would otherwise be free to say anything. It does not tell anybody what work is worth. It decides when money becomes due, what has to be said to reduce it, and what you can do when it does not arrive.
The practical consequence is that a good deal of what you are told about your own contract is wrong. Terms that are in the document are not necessarily terms that work.
The six rights
- Stage payments. Section 109 entitles you to payment by instalments or stage payments for work done, unless the contract specifies, or the parties agree, that the work will take less than 45 days. Where the parties have not agreed the amounts and intervals, the Scheme for Construction Contracts supplies them. A contract that says you get paid once at the end of a six month job does not work.
- An adequate payment mechanism. Section 110 requires the contract to provide an adequate mechanism for determining what payments become due and when, and a final date for payment. It also stops that mechanism being made conditional on the performance of obligations under another contract, or on somebody's decision about whether those obligations were performed.
- Payment notices. Section 110A requires notice within five days of the due date, stating the sum considered due and the basis of calculation. If the payer does not give one, section 110B lets you give a default notice instead, and the final date for payment is pushed back by the length of the delay.
- Payment of the notified sum. Section 111 requires the payer to pay the notified sum in full by the final date for payment, unless it has served a valid pay less notice in time. This is the engine of the whole regime and the one most worth understanding properly. It is covered in pay less notices, and the timetable behind them.
- Suspension for non-payment. Section 112 lets you suspend performance of any or all of your obligations where the notified sum has not been paid by the final date, after at least seven days' written notice, and recover your reasonable costs and time for the delay.
- Adjudication at any time. Section 108 gives a right to refer a dispute to an adjudicator who must decide within 28 days of referral. The decision binds until the dispute is finally determined by court, arbitration or agreement, which usually means it binds for good. What it costs, and when it is worth starting, is in when the contractor above you will not pay.
And the prohibition that goes with them: section 113 makes any term conditioning your payment on the payer being paid by somebody else ineffective, unless that third party is insolvent. See pay when paid, and why it does not bind you.
Most of the industry uses two of these six. The other four are free, already yours, and generally more effective than another email.
You do not need a signed contract
Section 107 restricted the Act to agreements in writing, and it was repealed with effect from 1 October 2011 in England and Wales. Oral and partly oral construction contracts now carry the same payment and adjudication rights as a fully executed subcontract.
This matters more than it sounds, because a large share of UK subcontracting runs on an order confirmed by phone and a rate agreed in a car park. Having nothing signed is a serious evidential problem: you will have to prove what was agreed. It is not a jurisdictional one, and being told you have no rights because you never signed anything is simply wrong.
Who the Act does not cover
Two exclusions, and the second one surprises people.
Residential occupiers. Section 106 excludes a construction contract with a residential occupier, meaning one relating principally to operations on a dwelling that one of the parties occupies, or intends to occupy, as a residence. If your customer is the homeowner, none of Part II applies and your contract governs instead. Contracting with a developer or a landlord does not fall within the exclusion, so the test is who you contracted with rather than the type of building.
Process plant. Section 105(2) takes certain operations outside the definition of construction operations altogether. Alongside drilling for oil and gas and the extraction of minerals, it excludes the assembly, installation or demolition of plant or machinery on a site where the primary activity is nuclear processing, power generation, water or effluent treatment, or the production, transmission, processing or storage of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, oil, gas, steel, or food and drink.
Read that list again if you do mechanical and electrical work. A firm installing plant at a power station, a water treatment works, a dairy or a food production facility can find its work falls outside the statutory payment regime and outside the right to adjudicate, on exactly the kind of contract where it most wants both. The exclusion is drawn around the plant work rather than the site, and the boundaries have been litigated repeatedly, so a job of that kind is worth checking before you price it rather than after you are unpaid.
Two further points. The Act applies to construction operations carried out in England, Wales and Scotland, so it does not reach work done abroad even for a UK client. And Scotland and Northern Ireland run their own versions of the Scheme, on the same architecture but with their own statutory instruments, so an English default period cannot be lifted onto a Scottish job.
None of the above is a software question and Unibuild does not decide any of it. What every one of these rights has in common is that using it requires you to say, quickly and with evidence, what was applied for, on what date, what came back and what was said in between. Applications sit against the project with their dates and receipts, retention withheld is captured against the receipt it came off, gross applied and gross balance are calculated as at each row's own date rather than only as at today, and outstanding value is aged into current, thirty, sixty, ninety and one hundred and twenty plus days by the manager responsible. The rights are statutory. The two days of digging that normally sits between deciding to use one and being able to is not, and that is the part this removes.
Where to start, on Monday
Answer two questions about the contract you are currently applying under. Does the Act apply to it, meaning is your customer not a residential occupier and is the work not caught by the process plant exclusion. And what are your four dates: due date, payment notice, pay less deadline, final date for payment.
If the answer to the first is yes and you cannot answer the second in under a minute, that is the gap. It takes one reading of the payment schedule to close, and it is the difference between having six rights and having two.
The follow-up questions.
Every term used here is defined in the construction glossary.
What is the Construction Act?+
Does the Construction Act apply without a written contract?+
Am I entitled to interim payments?+
Does the Construction Act apply to work on someone's home?+
Does the Act cover M&E work on a power station or food factory?+
Can a contract exclude the Construction Act?+
More from Insights.
RAMS that hold upWhat an inspector is actually looking for in a risk assessment and method statement, and the difference between a document that exists and one that is doing its job.Read it →
Retention, and the money that goes missing after practical completionWhere cash quietly disappears between the last valuation and the release of the second half of retention, and the four dates that decide whether you ever see it.Read it →
Why field rollouts stall in week threeMost site software is not rejected. It is quietly outlived by the paper route nobody switched off. What the firms that got it to stick did differently.Read it →